Application Deadlines

This webpage indicates the upcoming deadlines for evaluation of your academic credentials. There are four (4) review cycles each year, the stages of which are outlined below. Please read closely to understand the process and timelines of your application. For questions, see our FAQs.

UPCOMING DEADLINE DATES:

January 3, 2025

April 1, 2025

July 1, 2025

October 1, 2025

January 6, 2026

 

Application Stages - The Lifecycle of an Application

Applicants often wonder why we ask for 90 business days to make a decision. The following information should help!

Stage 1: Administrative Check (2 weeks)

After we receive your application, our staff check it over to ensure it is complete and correct. Note that we receive about 100+ applications per review period (some of which are re-evaluations) and have a lot to process.

Here are the kinds of things we check and find to be common mistakes:

  • Applicants adding courses in the wrong areas.
  • Unsubmitted documents including transcripts, instructor credentials information (when required), and syllabi (when required).
  • Incomplete instructor credentials forms. Sometimes institutions miss instructors or only give partial information.
  • Unclear course numbers, institutions, course names, or credits assigned. You add these manually and might make mistakes that require clarification.
    Insufficient credit totals.

Stage 2: Committee Review (2 weeks)

Once your application has gone through the administrative check, it is sent to the Credentials Evaluation Sub-Committee (CESC). Each member of the CESC reviews multiple applications (between 5 and 15) depending on the review period. They are given 2 weeks to review these applications. Sometimes these reviews become quite complex and can take longer. Perhaps you think 2 weeks is a long time, but consider the following:

CESC members have full time jobs and are volunteers reviewing applications in their free time!

  • An application is long (at minimum 20 courses, usually 24+) and each course is evaluated separately. Some of these course reviews take less time than others, but most require a CESC member to look between multiple documents. For example, they might: check the instructor credentials from one document; review the syllabus in another document; check an internal guide to help determine course fit; check the Criteria to further determine fit and compliance with rules; check transcripts to make sure the information stubmitted is accurate and that the course was granted credit; and so on! This doesn't include other evaluations often needing to be made such as reviewing theses or programs as a whole.
  • CESC members often need time to consult with one another and with CAP to ensure consistency across application reviews and between the Criteria and applications.
  • The above doesn't even begin to factor in the time required for more complex applications, especially those where applicants attended multiple institutions or international schools where many more documents (often hundreds of pages long!) are reviewed.

Stage 3: Administrative Review (4-6 weeks)

This stage is the most variable. CAP Staff, alongside the CESC Chair, review applications to ensure that they have been consistently and fairly assessed. As the evaluation process is complex, it helps to have a system of checks and balances to ensure consistency across reviews. Sometimes credits are missed, instructional hours are miscalculated, courses are assigned to the wrong areas, instructor credentials are misinterpreted, and so on. It takes a team aproach to ensure standardized reviews, so we review applications before sending out decisions. Often, this causes a delay because, if a mistake is found, the application must be sent back to the CESC member and modified. Our CESC members are volunteers with full time jobs (or more), so they can't always review applications at a moment's notice. Sometimes application updates require discussion, which can also take time.

Stage 4: Decision Letter Preparation (4-6 weeks)

Once the application has been fully reviewed and checked, it is ready to be translated into a decision letter. These decision letters are written one-by-one (except in the case of approvals, which require much less applicant-specific information). In these letters, we have to explain course-by-course decisions in many cases, and indicate a rationale. This takes time. These letters are also reviewed to ensure correctness and clarity.

Stage 5: Decision Delivery

Once the letter is prepared and checked, we send it to you! You find out if your application was accepted, denied, or deferred. This sets in motion a whole other set of steps you might take, including submitting further/missing information, requesting a re-review, and so on. Read more about those other steps here and in the FAQs.

 

Application Status - What it Means

Wondering what the status of your online application form means?


Copyright 2024 by College of Alberta Psychologists

Pathways

This content appears in certain menu dropdowns as well as the homepage pathways. Editing these edits all of them.

Form icon

Registration and Renewal

This section provides information and resources regarding registration requirements, fees and renewing a practice permit.

Read More

Speech bubble icon

Concerns About a Psychologist

This section provides information and resources to address concerns about the conduct of a psychologist. 

 

Read More

People heart icon

Regulatory Navigation

CAP communicates with members, providing regulatory information.

Read More

About CAP

Learn more about CAP and its mandated responsibiliites under the Health Professions Act. 

Resources & Regulatory Information

A number of documents govern the regulation of the profession of psychology and documents and resources are developed in order to promote competent and ethical practice and to guide its members. 

Sexual Abuse/Misconduct

Addressing and Preventing Sexual Abuse and Misconduct for Psychologists